Mar 2 2011 04:48 PM ET

'Troubadours' review: James Taylor, Carole King, Joni Mitchell... was the music better back then?

Tonight, Troubadours, a well-done documentary subtitled “The Rise of the Singer-Songwriter,” will, depending on your point of view, confirm or try to convince you that James Taylor, Carole King, Joni Mitchell, the Eagles and their ilk represented a summit of popular music. It also serves as proof that nostalgia has its limits.

The documentary, premiering on PBS’ American Masters, is full of rare footage, and is ostensibly about The Troubadour, the famous Los Angeles nightclub that showcased early, career-making performances of acts ranging from Taylor to Elton John. The film also trades heavily on the greatest-hits tour that Taylor and Carole King conducted in 2010.

Troubadours does a good job of placing the early-’70s explosion in performers who wrote their own material in the post-Beatle era in perspective, documenting how essentially folk-based musicians, inspired by the Beatles and Bob Dylan, folded rock instrumentation as well as fame and its attendant wealth into their careers. Coinciding with a growing music industry, these sensitive souls ended up powerful superstars.

There are interviews of varying degrees of illumination by Taylor (who speaks uninsightfully about his music and frankly of his drug addiction and recovery), King (who seems like one of the nicest people imaginable), Jackson Browne, David Crosby, Steve Martin (who played serious banjo in addition to working out his comedy act during that era), the excellent author Barney Hoskyns, and the great rock photographer Henry Diltz. There are some interesting comments from the small circle of musicians who backed a lot of these artists in the recording studio, including guitarist Danny Kortchmar.

Kortchmar takes a gratuitous swipe at  rock critics who had the gall to suggest that some of this music wasn’t all genius material. “Nobody remembers Lester Bangs, but everyone remembers James Taylor,” says Kortchmar. “The music always wins — always.”

Since Bangs isn’t around to defend himself, and as someone who edited some of Lester’s terrific prose, I’ll assert this: Bangs’ writing will be remembered as long as Danny Kortchmar’s contribution to music, to say the very least.

The rock critic Robert Christgau turns up at just the right moment, about two-thirds of the way through, to provide a bracing counterpoint to the misty hosannas to this era, articulating as he does the flaws in the hedonistic self-absorption that characterized a chunk of this music and its Los Angeles social scene — in particular, for Christgau, the fungible music and haughty attitude of the Eagles.

Oh, and to answer the question I posed in the headline: No, of course the music wasn’t “better” then than it is now. (Well, for the most part; I’ll put Al Green’s Call Me and Joni Mitchell’s Blue up against anything you can throw at them.) The music, and the music industry, was simply different. The music of the Troubadours era came along just at the end of the time when pop culture was mass culture, the culture everyone shared. It thrived before it splintered into oppositional sub-genres, and before the music business was weakened by a rapaciousness which sought to commodify the very spontaneity that could make the troubadours seem fresh, or even like sages.

They weren’t, of course. But when you look at Troubadours, you get the feeling that they sure had a lot of fun. Those poor American Idol kids — they’re stuck in a music world that obliges them to make it look like such hard work.

Twitter: @kentucker

Comments (45 total) Add your comment
Page: 1 2 3
  • LOL

    The music was much better then than it is now.

    • Dory

      I agree 100%.

      • Raymond

        I agree ∞ %

      • DRG

        The music was better back then if only because the 70′s did not have Lady Ca Ca.

      • zili

        Since Bangs isn’t around to defend himself, and as someone who edited some of Lester’s terrific prose, I’ll assert this: Bangs’ writing will be remembered as long as Danny Kortchmar’s contribution to music, to say the very least.I am an Air Force and single at present .I need a woman who can love me back ..I also uploaded my hot photos on Uniformedmate .C oM under the name of hoho212..It’s the largest and best club for seeking Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, Police Force, and the admirers of those who wear the uniform.I just hope you don’t mind me being a soldier …Please Check it out!I’m serious.

      • Tall Amy

        Amazing and I love it with perfection and honesty, daring beauty and TallPeopleMeet was amazing

  • Andrei

    Ken, thanks for the defense of Lester Bangs – it saves me from having to do a little head-smacking myself!

    I guess I have to be a little grateful for these artists; after all, it was in reaction to them (and the prog/art – rock movement) that punk roared forth in the mid to late ’70′s. So for that, thanks!

    • Andrei

      And for those who think the music was better then, just remember that 90% of music in ANY era is crap – mercifully, we just forget the bad stuff as time moves on (for this period, think Osmonds, Terry Jacks, Bo Donaldson and the Heywoods…)

  • Amanda

    The music was definitely better in the 70′s and original…no repeats or versions of originals

    • Andrei

      Linda Rondstadt ring a bell? Sha Na Na? Nah, no covers there…

  • jfms777

    The music was better. End of story.

  • ks

    I don’t know if better , they were all pioneers of their time. Though I like them all, you have to move on and listen to newer music, most progressive, operatic, poetic music comes in the form of Eropean music. Avantasia is a wonderful example of some of todays great singer/songwritter music. It is all subjective.

  • Lyn

    Each generation chooses music that represents it in some way; no use wailing about how it’s gone downhill, etc. But when you read/learn about musicians of that era — everyone from Taylor and Mitchell to Jagger and Richards — you can’t help but notice their classic influences. Not just classical, of course, but poetry, literature, and pop music classics from eras when rhythm and words and rhyme schemes really were worked on and perfected. So yeah, besides the generational angst that was expressed (as always), their music was just more . . . musical.

    • Michaelann

      Agreed-perfect way of stating it–just more musical.

    • Susie

      Mighty useful. Make no mtsaike, I appreciate it.

  • silk

    It is 100%, definitely better then than now! Back then, we concentrate more on the music itself than the performers. Back then, we don’t need to swear and scream to make music, back then, musicians made music because of music.

  • Brian H

    I still listen to 70s singer-songwriters on a regular basis. There was no Auto-tune. These people had voices and ideas. Phoebe Snow, certainly not MTV video material, but who has more vocal talent than almost anyone in the past 40 years or so, was able to be a STAR with a hit singles and albums.

    So, yes, music was better then, because the artists weren’t chosen for beauty, but for talent, they had to sing in their own voices (not synthesized through Auto-tune), and their lyrics were far more literate than most (but not all) of today’s music.

    • Kate

      I agree, the music was better because they were chosen for their talent and not their looks or kareoke ability.

  • Frank from MusicNerdClub.com

    There’s always great music in any era – perhaps there was more of it in the ’70′s, though there’s plenty to brag about right now – just check out the new R.E.M. and PJ Harvey albums from this year just getting started. And last year was vintage: Vampire Weekend, Arcade Fire, LCD Soundsystem, Robert Plant, Neil Young, The Black Keys, and Kings of Leon among others are all classic-worthy recordings. Rejoice that we can have both then and now to enjoy!

    • Schneid

      Agreed! There was great music in the 70s, though I tend to lean toward the Clash/Sex Pistols end of the spectrum. But if you think there’s nothing but dross out there today, you’re not trying hard enough — P.J. Harvey, Radiohead, the National and so on, and great singer-songwriters like
      Richard Hawley and Matthew Ryan. Plus barn-burners like Les Savy Fav and the Dirtbombs to keep things exciting.

  • Chris

    Let me guess….another documentary that will completely ignore Tim Buckley, the best singer of the entire era.

  • Jeff

    DO YOU HONESTLY MEAN TO SIT THERE AND WRITE THAT TODAY’S MUSIC IS BETTER THAN THE MUSIC MADE IN THE 70S?!?!?! Nevermind auto-tune and Lady GaGa…I dare anyone to take the top 15 tracks from the last 20 years, and the top 15 tracks from the 70s, and see who wins…it’s not even a contest…all rock stars have been desperately trying to equal the greatness that was rock in the vinyl years for a long time…nevermind having the audacity to claim any of them are creating anything “better”…come on, man…you can’t be serious…

  • CaliJ

    There is no better or not,it’s art and all subjective to personal preference.It’s all relative,for every great 70′s artist I’m certain a current artist could be argued for as well. Wilco vs. The Eagles…whatever we’re lucky to have them both.
    What I do think about our present musical times,is that we live in the greatest era ever for access to music.I can listen to anything ever recorded and the click of my mouse..WOW !
    It does sound like a good show though and I look forward to watching it.

  • AIDA HALLUSKA

    this was a wonderful show. i will buy the cd tomorrow. I never enjoyed a show SO MUCH!!! James Taylor and Carol are beautiful!!!

  • jackie

    Please let me know what major popular artists today are in the same league with Taylor, Mitchell, King, CSN&Y etc. Really who? These folks were great musicians–wrote music and lyrics and could sing. Come on Ken. Popular music is all manufactured in a studio. I’ve seen James Taylor many times live and he is just incredible. The music he gets out of that guitar is magic. Not to mention songwriting skills and that honeyed voice. That’s a triple threat. Now every song has has more co-writers than chords. Not to mention the fact that the lyrics are usually very weak and the performer can’t sing it live without it being auto-tuned to death. I am not saying that there are not talented artists today–but most of them can’t sell a lot of records.

    • Jan

      Patty Griffin. Tift Merritt.

  • Bob

    “Troubadours” is not only a great documentary spotlighting the careers of two of the most prolific singer/songwriters of all-time (Taylor and King), but, it’s prove that the music made today, while certainly great to sweat to, will never produce artists like James Taylor and Carole King. Will we remember the latest Taylor Swift or Drake song in 40 years. I don’t think so

Page: 1 2 3
Add your comment
The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP