I admire the way my colleague Michael Slezak has analyzed the shortcomings of Adam Lambert’s AMA performance. Read the full post.
Nov 23
2009
10:44 AM ET
In defense of Adam Lambert: As a TV event, he was splendid
- Comments 713
- Add comment
Latest News
- Matthew Fox accuser drops assault claim
- Emma Stone set for an 'iCarly' cameo
- 'Hatfield and McCoys' sets ratings record
- 'Iron Man 3': Hints on the new villain?
- Kathie Lee Gifford: Awkward TV moments
- 'Friends' vet is new 'Whitney' showrunner
- 'Toddlers & Tiaras' star gets TLC spinoff
- 'Devil Wears Prada' sequel in the works








Yeah poor Adam is crying all the way to the BANK….. When your as talented as he is ya don’t need to go where he went not sure why he did except he felt he had something to prove…. whatever that may have been… ….. he has more talent in his baby finger than every other performer at the AMA has as a whole…. You go Adam !!!
He just wants to create drama and scandal to sell records. madaonna and britney did the same thing shortpeopledate.com
The AMA’s would of been very boring without Adam…why don’t we get down to business and let Adam be the wonderful entertainer that he is and stop the gay (crap)..Who really cares that is not what it is about anyway and it just keeps going…Let Adam be an entertainer….He is wonderful…
I’m shocked that I found this info so elaisy.