Archive: October 2009 (51-60 of 69)

Oct 8 2009 07:55 AM ET

'The New Adventures of Old Christine' and 'The Middle': Two frustrated characters, two strong sitcoms

Patricia-Heaton-Julia-louise_l

The New Adventures of Old Christine and The Middle — if you watched them back-to-back last night, you got to see two stars wringing fresh changes on tired sitcom premises.

Julia Louis-Dreyfus and show creator Kari Lizer continue to take Christine to places most laffers wouldn’t bother trying to go. Last night’s storyline had Christine finding a “freckle” under her breast and assuming she has cancer and will die. Even as I write it, it sounds like pure poor taste, doesn’t it? Yet if you watched, you saw how, thanks to Louis-Dreyfus’ go-for-broke performance as an incorrigibly self-centered person, it was proven yet again that no subject is off-limits for comedy. And the pay-off — that the freckle was a piece of brownie stuck “up there” — only confirmed this.

After that, switching from CBS to ABC brought us to The Middle, and Patricia Heaton’s Midwestern family sitcom. Again, a cliche has been seized — in this case, the harried mom/wife — and exploded. Heaton’s Frankie has a mantra (“It’s fine, everything’s fine”) that doesn’t hold up to the truth of the economy.

Strapped for cash, unable to afford repairs to a broken clothes dryer, and desperate to perform so small a parental duty as check out a library book for her son Brick, Frankie was driven to manic distraction. When the episode ended with a tornado, I thought the half-hour was going to blow away into slapstick silliness. Instead, the episode had been cleverly constructed to arrive at a miracle: a new dryer blown by the storm onto her front lawn. As with Christine, The Middle‘s pay-off left us on a high note.

Did you watch? Do you enjoy these sitcom women?

Oct 7 2009 11:05 PM ET

'South Park' season premiere: 'I see dead celebrities'

Filed under: News and tagged: , , , ,

The ceaseless flow of bad taste that South Park emits like lava from a volcano erupted again on Wednesday night. And what I mean by that is, I laughed until I choked at the season premiere’s highly irreverent salute to “celebrities that died over the summer.”

Poor little Ike whimpered, “I see dead celebrities,” and so did we: South Park-ed versions of Billy Mays, David Carradine, Farrah Fawcett, Ed McMahon, Walter Cronkite, DJ AM, and Michael Jackson, among others, were said to be trapped in purgatory, waiting impatiently to enter heaven.

READ FULL STORY »

Oct 7 2009 11:23 AM ET

Jon and Kate Gosselin will finally get justice on 'Law & Order'

Sam-Waterston-Kate-Gosselin_l

Even the venerable Law & Order is not immune to the — well, “charms” isn’t the word, is it? — the mess that is Jon & Kate Plus Eight, Kate Plus Eight, or the current talk-show saga I call Jon & Kate Against The World.

On Oct. 16, Law & Order will air an episode entitled “Reality Bites,” in which a ripped-from-the-headlines couple are divorcing and, according to reports, the Kate-like figure is murdered, with the Jon-like character a suspect.

Law & Order has been having a great season so far. (Did anyone catch its season premiere, with Sam Waterston taking on government officials who sanctioned torture?) I’m going to get an advance peek at the Oct. 16 episode soon, and will report back.

Do you think the Gosselins are a torture even the great Waterston cannot handle?

Oct 6 2009 01:53 PM ET

Jon Gosselin: Nancy Grace shuts him up, shuts him down

Nancy Grace has never struck me as a paragon of common sense, but sometimes all that free-floating anger of hers can be used for the forces of good… or at least to force Jon Gosselin to stop babbling. Last night on The Insider, Grace was on the show’s panel of interrogators. As Gosselin and that goofy, useless lawyer of his we know from his Larry King Live appearance sat groping for words, Grace let loose:

I like the moment when he’s asked about his kids and Gosselin starts in with the “I know I was passive, I know I was an avoider” jargon he recently learned in therapy. Grace just shuts him down: “Why is this always about you? Why are we talking about you? You were asked about your children.”

Silence. Skin-crawling, blank-stare silence from Jon. Then: “I don’t know — I thought you needed insight.” No, I think the term he was looking for was that he needed a sound-bite, to match what Grace was throwing at him.

Nancy Grace is a bully, to be sure. But, man: How dumb do you have to be to go on The Insider up against a whole crew waiting to tear you apart? Jon, stop the madness… or at least hire Kate’s agent so that next time, you get booked on The Today Show.

Maybe you feel differently?

Oct 6 2009 07:48 AM ET

The David Letterman controversy: Other talk show hosts refrain from jokes and attacks... except for Don Imus

Filed under: News and tagged: , , ,

imus_l

Now in week two of the Letterman controversy, talk-show hosts don’t seem to have much stomach for attacking Late Show host.

Last night, there were no Dave jokes from Jay Leno. No jabs from Jon Stewart. None from Conan O’Brien.

As I reported last night, Craig Ferguson devoted his “cold open” to the topic of his boss, Letterman. The first words out of his mouth? “I guess by now you’ve figured out how I got the job.” The Scottish-American rascal, turning the I-slept-with-the-boss cliche on its ear, kept the comedy turned inward. “If we are now holding late night talk show hosts to the same moral accountability as we hold politicians or clergyman – I’m out.  I’m gone.” It was both the funniest and the smartest way to approach this.

Elsewhere on the media, Don Imus, from his new perch on the Fox Business Channel early in the morning, said today that Letterman is “a creep. He’s become the creep he’s been making fun of forever.”

At the same time, he also found common ground with other news-channel commentators such as Bill O’Reilly and Keith Olbermann: “[Letterman] isn’t a serial killer,” acknowledged Imus. “People calling for his job — it’s absurd.” And in that area, Imus knows whereof he speaks.

For more on David Letterman:

Craig Ferguson talks about his boss

David Letterman: Bill O’Reilly and Keith Olbermann… for the defense!

Oct 6 2009 07:09 AM ET

David Letterman, with 'heartache and embarrassment' and wit and strength, re-frames the media controversy, magnificently

Filed under: News and tagged: , , ,

letterman_l

No joke: Last night’s Late Show with David Letterman was such a superb hour of television, from his opening monologue to his goofing around with guests Steve Martin and Martin Short, that it reminded us all over again how invaluable he is.

Letterman made what was more than just another apology: He re-framed what has become an out-of-control media sensation and put it in a humane perspective. While initially peppered with rueful jokes — “I got into my car this morning and even the navigation lady wasn’t speaking to me”; ”Chilly outside my house this morning; chilly inside my house” — his monologue concluded and he went to his desk.

From there, he made the public apology to his wife, Regina Lasko, that EW reported earlier, saying that “She has been horribly hurt by my behavior, and when something happens like that, if you hurt a person and it’s your responsibility, you try to fix it.  And at that point, there’s only two things that can happen:  either you’re going to make some progress and get it fixed, or you’re going to fall short and perhaps not get it fixed, so let me tell you folks, I got my work cut out for me.”

He also apologized to his staff “for, once again, putting up with something stupid I’ve gotten myself involved in.” “No, I’m not having sex [with staff members now]. Those episodes are in the past.”

But then he defended himself, reminding viewers he was “the victim… of a felony extortion, a separate part of the equation.” Which was to say: Yes, I made a big personal mistake, but there’s another person who actually broke the law. I was blackmailed. “You can’t be victimized by criminals,” he concluded forcefully.

Then Steve Martin came out and said that this controversy, “proves that you’re a human being.” He paused. Then: “We weren’t really that sure before.”

Martin then went on to be very funny both by himself and with pal Martin Short. The moments when Short sat in Martin’s lap for “our old ventriloquist routine” were exceedingly funny. Letterman even made a cutting ad lib: “You spend one more minute on his lap, you’re gonna get blackmailed.”

There is no one in late night television with the range of knowledge, the approach to interviewing, and such an intangible mixture of comedic skill and self-revelation. We should take a moment to step back and realize that Letterman is just as great a performer as his hero Johnny Carson and his influence Steve Allen. It’s time for those calling for his head to calm down and let the man do his job, the job he does as no one else does, and no one will ever do as well again.

What did you think of last night’s show?

For more on David Letterman:

David Letterman apologizes to his wife on tonight’s ‘Late Show’

Oct 5 2009 10:29 PM ET

Exclusive preview: Craig Ferguson will talk tonight about his 'boss,' David Letterman

Filed under: News and tagged: , ,

ferguson_l

Be sure to watch The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson tonight from the very beginning. Ferguson will come out at the top of the show and offer his own take on the troubles of his boss, David Letterman, whose Worldwide Pants company produces Ferguson’s show.

Ferguson will say, among other things, “He is my boss. And my job is to take the number-one news story of the day and have a bit of fun with it… Imagine: The person you work for, the person you admire and respect, is caught in an embarrassing situation. And your job is to be funny about that, whilst trying to keep your own job.”

The Scottish-American goes on: “If we are now holding late night talk show hosts to the same moral accountability as we hold politicians or clergyman – I’m out.  I’m gone. Because I don’t think I have kept it a secret from you that I have a few incidences in my own past.” (Ferguson’s bouts with drugs and alcohol are amply documented in his new book, American On Purpose.)

Then Ferguson gets to the heart of it: “I feel very bad about this because… I quite like my entertainers to be dangerous. I like my musicians to be kind of drug-fueled. If you want entertainers to be squeaky clean then who are you going to be watching? The Jonas Bros. Exactly.”

There’s more where that came from, later tonight. Will you tune in?

Oct 5 2009 09:14 PM ET

The David Letterman controversy: Bill O'Reilly and Keith Olbermann... for the defense!

BillOReilly-Olbermann_l

David Letterman’s woes were chewed over tonight by those time-slot enemies, Bill O’Reilly and Keith Olbermann on Fox News’ O’Reilly Factor and MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann.

O’Reilly described Letterman’s admissions as “a sordid situation [but] we don’t want to revel in suffering.” But his guest, former CBS newsman-turned-conservative pundit Bernard Goldberg wanted to attack: “Let’s say it was Rush Limbaugh [in this situation]. The media would give it more ink than Hiroshima.”

O’Reilly was tempted to join in on this point: “Yeah, if he had been a conservative, it would have been more about his hypocrisy.” But then O’Reilly circled back to defend Dave. “If you’re a comedian, you tell jokes, your writing staff gives you jokes, you’re not gonna be a perfect person, you can’t blame him for telling jokes about people like Elliot Spitzer — that was a prostitution beef, no comparison [to Letterman's situation].” Oooh: prostitution “beef” — so hard-boiled-detective of you, Bill!

Meanwhile, Olbermann had a more interesting perspective: He talked about having worked with Letterman’s accused extortionist, CBS news producer Joe Halderman some years ago and while crediting Halderman with skill at his job, his emotional make-up was, well, let Keith articulate it: “If you gave me a list of 250 people who had been accused of doing this, he’d be at the least in my top five,” said Olbermann flatly of Halderman.

Olbermann expressed disbelief that “the bigger story” in the media is Letterman and not “the fact that a valued CBS news producer for decades” tried to pull off such a crime.

So in a way, O’Reilly and Olbermann have finally found something to agree on: Get off Dave’s back, America!

Oct 5 2009 11:10 AM ET

David Letterman: Freedom of speech victim, or self-censoring?

letterman_l

Ever since David Letterman delivered his extraordinary revelations last Thursday, I’ve been checking in at CBS’ website for that 10-minute clip. I wanted to embed the clip in what I wrote about the incident, so you could see it for yourself and compare your opinion against mine.

But as The New York Times reports, not only has that clip never been placed on CBS’ website, but the network is doing its best to keep it off YouTube as well. As a result, now you can’t even see the Letterman clip on my original post about the extortion and sex story.

CBS’ reasoning is obvious, from a big-business perspective: CBS most likely finds Letterman’s meticulously worded mea culpa embarrassing and thinks the controversy will go away faster if it makes the clip go away. Another way to look at this: a source close to the Late Show confirmed to EW that Letterman’s production company Worldwide Pants asked CBS to not stream the video and the network obliged.

Either way, I think it’s a mistake. Now there are tons of people who’ll keep trying to post that clip to defy the network’s clampdown. Meanwhile, folks will, in their imaginations, misremember what Letterman said, and perhaps think what he admitted to was worse than was actually uttered. (“Hey, didn’t Dave say he also liked to dress up in Johnny Carson’s underwear? No?”)

CBS is clearly keeping track of what gets posted on its website now. You can find Friday’s cheerful interview with Larry David now on CBS.com, but you can’t see that night’s other guest, Olivia Wilde. Why? I suspect it’s because, in the course of telling a story about how she moved into a bus with her husband, the House star said flirtily to Dave, “I’m sure you could get many, many women to move into your car with you.” Uh-oh…

On the CBS website, there’s a written summary of that night’s show, but Wilde’s comment isn’t transcribed.

So if you have Dave’s Thursday admission on your DVR, keep it: You’ve got a collector’s item.

What do you think about the suppression of Letterman’s comments?

Oct 5 2009 02:00 AM ET

'Curb Your Enthusiasm': Does the 'Seinfeld' reunion work for you?

Tagged: ,

For me, the Seinfeld-reunion storyline dreamed up by Larry David — the man; the TV character — for Curb Your Enthusiasm is one of the funniest, smartest ideas of the new season.

Seeing Jerry, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Jason Alexander, and Michael Richards each take command of his or her own scene with TV-Larry pitching them on a reunion resulted in shrewd acting all around. Each avoided any trace of their Seinfeld character-traits, yet came across as believable “real” people trying to figure out whether this reunion thing was a good idea. (In the Curb universe, everyone is always out for him- or herself.) I thought it was an especially nice touch to have Jason Alexander be the one to bad-mouth the infamously devisive (oh, I’ll just say it: goofy-verging-on-lousy) final episode of Seinfeld, and to see a reunion as a way for the older show to redeem itself.

If Curb had been really pushing it, I suppose mention should have been made of Michael Richards’ 2006 controversial rant. (Don’t you think TV-Larry, being the cynical fellow he is, would express some misgivings about this?) But who knows what David has up his sleeve for the rest of this story-arc? Perhaps I question him too soon regarding this particular matter…

In any case, I think it’s terrific that Meg Ryan is willing to play along in being Larry’s roadblock to casting Cheryl in the reunion — I buy that Ryan would think this is a good opportunity to show she still has some comedy chops after too many recent years of strenuous dramas.

All in all, a first-rate half-hour. What did you think?

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP