Archive: October 2009 (21-30 of 69)

Oct 24 2009 08:00 AM ET

New series 'White Collar': Slick and smart. What did you think?

white-collar_l

Slick and smart, White Collar‘s first episode struck me as charming escapism. It fits the USA Network’s business plan of sunny crime-solving shows — Burn Notice; Royal Pains — but it didn’t come off like a show conceived as a cynical ratings ploy. Instead, the brisk pace and easygoing chemistry between White Collar‘s stars, Matt Bomer and Tim DeKay, is something that can’t be faked for very long. These guys just seem to work well together.

If you buy the premise — that Bomer’s Neal Caffrey is a master con man and thief whose abilities are fully equal to DeKay’s first-class FBI guy Peter Burke — then you buy the show. The merits of White Collar can’t be ascribed just to movies that have been popping up in many other reviews (Spielberg’s Catch Me If You Can, most frequently), but goes back at least as far as the Paul Newman-Robert Redford flick The Sting. It’s the pleasure of seeing pros do their thing with panache, while ribbing each other and tweaking the audience.

Bomer arrives with a lot of fan goodwill from his stint on Chuck. And those hardy few of us who watched HBO’s sorely under-viewed 2007 series Tell Me You Love Me know what a fine dramatic actor McKay is. (And I’m tellin’ ya, folks — you missed a whole lotta Sonya Walger that they’ve never shown on Lost or FastForward.)

I’m not saying White Collar is instant-classic TV. Created by Jeff Eastin, it’s fun, and occasionally more than fun, as when Neal tries coming on to Burke’s female FBI colleague only to discover she’s gay and says, “Don’t you guys have some rule about that?” To which Burke replied, “Yeah: We don’t ask, we don’t care.”

That’s the kind of line that could keep me caring for White Collar. Add Tiffani Thiessen as Burke’s wife and Willie Garson from Sex and the City as Neal’s shady pal, and it’s a no-brainer can’t-miss.

Did you watch? What did you think?

Oct 23 2009 11:46 PM ET

Why is Jeff Dunham so popular? You be the critic!

Tagged:

Okay, so The Jeff Dunham Show premiered this week to become the highest-rated first-episode of any show in the history of Comedy Central in the coveted 18-49 demo. That’s right, the same Comedy Central that brings you The Colbert Report and South Park. Both, upstaged by a ventriloquist with spikey hair.

And Comedy Central says the ventriloquist’s show, featuring fan-fave characters like grumpy-old-man Walter and Achmed the Dead Terrorist, was the “most-watched show on cable for Thursday” among total viewers.

Yet whenever we here at EW.com post anything about Dunham, the majority of the response is pretty negative. Um, make that really, sarcastically negative.

Me, I have an irrational fondness for ventriloquists. Every year I try to con a different EW editor into letting me go to the annual “vent” convention in Kentucky (so far without success). Clearly, I am not an objective observer. Thus, I am turning the job over to you on this one.

Watch this clip:

Now: Tell me why you think Jeff Dunham is so popular.

Or tell me why you don’t find him funny.

And those of you who are actually Dunham fans, defend your man.

All comments welcome below. Thanks.

Oct 23 2009 11:17 AM ET

Who was Soupy Sales, and why we'll miss him

Filed under: News and tagged: , ,

Soupy Sales died at age 83 yesterday. He hosted an afternoon kiddie show that reached its height of popularity in the mid-1960s. He was totally unlike other kids-show hosts of that, or any other, era. He wasn’t soft-spoken, like Mr. Rogers; he wasn’t grandfatherly, like Captain Kangaroo; he didn’t want to teach you anything, like Mr. Wizard.

What Soupy was was a unique combination of silly and hip. He mixed slapstick with self-conscious irony. He was forever getting a pie thrown in his face. He talked to puppets, especially two — White Fang and Black Tooth — that were really little more than offstage voices, with arms that entered the camera frame. He played jazz on his show and snapped his fingers like a nightclub performer. Cool cats and kitties of the era, like Frank Sinatra and Shirley MacLaine, dropped by to visit and take a pie in the face, because Soupy was, for a little while, himself very cool.

He had a Top 10 hit at the height of Beatlemania with “Do The Mouse.” His musical sons, Hunt and Tony, played with David Bowie in the band Tin Machine, and backed Iggy Pop on Lust For Life, among much other excellent L.A. session-work.

The Soupy Sales Show’s set decor said “clubhouse,” but the off-camera guffaws — when Soupy made the crew laugh with constant his ad libs — introduced a generation to the idea that there were real people behind the TV cameras, that this was a show, not a fantasy-world. Well before The Larry Sanders Show, Soupy was busy breaking the fourth-wall surrounding the creation of TV.

To his eternal and ambivalent fame, he was once suspended from the show for a New Year’s Day 1965 joke: he asked kids to go into their parents’ bedrooms and take the “little green pieces of paper” they found — i.e., money — and send them in to him.

I interviewed him for EW years ago, by phone. As the conversatiomn began to fade, Sales thanked me for not asking him about the “little green pieces of paper” controversy. “Everybody thinks they have to bring that up — why?” he asked me, irritation in his voice.

“Because their editors tell them to, thinking they’ll get a bit more controversy out of it,” I suggested.

“Yeah,” he said, sighing. “Maybe. Or maybe some people just like to make happy people unhappy.”

I hope Soupy Sales has found some happiness now.

Oct 22 2009 09:15 PM ET

Is this the most frustrating 'Survivor' ever?

survivor-Russell_l

I’m writing this just having seen this evening’s Survivor, and will mention a few things that occurred, so here’s your BIG, DON’T SAY I DIDN’T WARN YOU, SPOILER ALERT! READ FULL STORY »

Oct 22 2009 09:43 AM ET

'Law & Order: SVU' and 'Law & Order': Pedophiles and abortion: Does controversy = good drama?

Filed under: News and tagged: , , ,

Last night, Law & Order: SVU featured a plot about an organization that justifies sex between adult men and minors (boys or girls) as a civil right. Tomorrow night, Law & Order will air an episode about the murder of a doctor who performs abortions on pregnant women in their third trimester.

Hot-button issues are central to the L&O franchise, and this week’s topics don’t get any hotter. SVU, in an episode entitled “Hardwired,” had a stepfather (The Wire‘s excellent Jim True-Frost) molesting his stepson (Cruz Santiago) to the horror of the boy’s mother, played by Rosie Perez in a performance that NBC promoted heavily.

The plot took a twist when, having established the stepfather’s crime well before the half-hour mark, the stepdad proposed cutting a deal with the prosecutors in return for a bigger fish: the leader of Our Special Love, a pedophile civil-rights group, whom the stepfather says has many members and much kiddie porn to which he can lead the team.

My problem with this hour is the one I usually have with SVU, even as I know it’s the reason it gets bigger ratings and more kudos these days than the original Law & Order: Its heroes — Mariska Hargitay’s Benson and Christopher Meloni’s Stabler — are called upon to express extravagant shock and anger at all the dreadful details. I always think, these cops see despicable things like this week-in, week-out; have they never developed any emotional restraint, let alone a veneer of professional dispassion? Nope: there was Stabler, throttling a school coach whom he mistakenly thought was the perp early on in the episode, calling the guy a “kiddie-diddler” and a “scumbag pedophile.” And this was of a man who turned out not to have committed this particular crime. Do Stabler and Benson never learn to dial it down a notch? Yes, I know, I know: the coach did have a child-molestation record; my point is, again: unprofessional conduct always takes me out of the drama, no matter how well-written. From Rosie Perez, I expect out-sized emotion, and she did that mother proud.

I hope you’ll also watch Law & Order tomorrow. The episode called “Dignity” begins with the murder of a doctor who performs abortions — he’s shot while praying in church.

The killer is represented in court by an anti-abortion league lawyer played by Richard Thomas with perfectly calibrated restraint. Indeed, this is the performance NBC should be touting this week: Thomas is nuanced where everyone around him is encouraged to take sides and squabble. It’s all rather too neat: The show’s two cops, Lupo and Bernard, and its two Assistant District Attorneys, Cutter and Rubirosa, each take either a pro-life or pro-choice stand… at least, initially.

I don’t want to give more away; let me just say that by the end of this Law & Order, the drama runs more deeply, more effectively, because characters behave like humans. They think and reconsider; they debate and shift their positions slightly, this way and that. And I think you’ll be surprised at the low-key but still quite shocking final scene.

Did you watch SVU last night? What did you think? Will you watch a Law & Order with this theme?

Oct 22 2009 07:00 AM ET

Who's the funniest 'Modern Family' member?

Sofia-Vergara_l

This week, I think it was Ed O’Neill. Hey, next week, it could be Julie Bowen. Or Jesse Tyler Ferguson. That’s how good Modern Family is proving to be.

But this week, I have to hand it to Ed O’Neill. He’s been terrific as middle-aged grump Jay, married to the younger Gloria (and how quick and clever was Sofia Vergara last night as well?). O’Neill, who spent years doing drama to put some distance from his career-making role in Married… With Children, is working at a whole new level now. His Jay isn’t a heftier version of Al Bundy — Jay is a completely different comic creation. O’Neill isn’t playing Jay as your average sitcom guy having a mid-life crisis with a hotsy second wife. Instead, he’s made Jay a quietly happy but complicated and confused man. Sure, he’s pleased he was able to attract someone like Gloria, but he’s a man who sees how complicated life is. He knows he’s got his work cut out for him, being a stepfather to the clever but troubled Manny and re-wiring his old-straight-guy preconceptions about gay men in getting closer to his son, Mitchell, and Mitchell’s boyfriend, Cameron.

O’Neill anchored this week’s episode, about a family gathering at Jay’s house to watch a football game. Whether complaining about the amount of coffee Manny drank in the morning or advising everyone to avoid talking about their feelings (“That’s the worst thing you could do… Just sweep it under the rug”), Jay is a 20th-century guy coping with 21st-century social culture. It leads him into situations he could never have forseen, such as the scene in which he asked Mitchell and Cameron whether they found him attractive. When he said gruffly, “I know I’m not Erik Estrada or anything, but… ” I both laughed and felt a little ache for Jay’s sweet insecurity.

Jay is still the kind of man who thinks you settle a squabble between two boys by cuffing the ears of both of them and sending them on their way. (Manny and Luke deserved it.)

The terrific thing about Modern Family is that everyone has his or her reasons for doing the things they do. And Ed O’Neill knows what makes his character tick as well as any actor on TV.

Did you watch Modern Family this week? What did you think?

(Follow me on Twitter.)

Oct 21 2009 08:55 AM ET

'Sons of Anarchy' last night: How 'bout that Jax vs. Clay prison beat-down?

Ron-and-Charlie_l

It’s been building to this for weeks: The lumbering arthritic bear Clay wants violent revenge on Adam Ethan Zobelle. The dexterous blond Zen-master Jax wants to go a more strategic route. Put these two SAMCRO pros in orange jump-suits in prison, and things were bound to get ugly. Last night’s lengthy, climactic Sons of Anarchy fight — complete with elbows to face, boots to face, choke-holds and bear-hugs — was pretty close to better than anything on Ultimate Fighter. Kudos to Charlie Hunnam and Ron Perlman (and their stunt-men?) for really tearing into each other.

I thought I was going to dislike putting members of the motorcycle club in jail: How many movies and TV shows have we seen with rival criminal gangs struggled for protection, sex, and graft? But last night’s SOA was just about as good as a solid episode of HBO’s long-gone Oz.

And the separate interrogations of Clay and Jax by Ally Walker’s ATF agent Stahl were full of excellent psychological violence, as she tried to break each down — but Jax proved a worthy foe here, too.

As Bobby said, “This club needs a healing, brother.”

Yesterday in my post about Tuesday night being a TV wasteland, some commenters and Twitter-birds too me to task for not mentioning Sons of Anarchy. I should have been clearer: I meant broadcast, network TV. Over on basic cable, a series like Sons of Anarchy can save a night.

Did you watch?

Oct 20 2009 01:28 PM ET

Tuesday night is a TV wasteland. This is where 'Fringe' and 'Dollhouse' and 'Southland' and 'Parks and Recreation' should go.

southland2_l

Look at tonight’s network schedule. Do you really want to watch two hours of Biggest Loser? Of course you don’t: You’re smarter than that. The Forgotten on ABC? Give me a break. Do you care about 90210 at this point? Come on…

My wish (I know it won’t happen, because junk food like Biggest Loser gets bigger ratings, but a guy can dream) is that Tuesday, a night of higher viewership than Friday, should become the new showcase-evening for series such as my beloved Fringe, which is suffering from the Thursday-night glut of shows at 9 p.m. So is Parks and Recreation, which needs to be protected from Survivor and Bones (not that I have anything against those particular shows; it’s the time-period competition).

This is a night where NBC could have put Southland, at 9 p.m. Biggest Loser is an absolutely ideal Friday-night show — it belongs there. Hell, I’ll bet even a relocated Dollhouse would fare better on Tuesday nights.

fringe_l

Oh, if only we could be programmers. The ratings might go kerflooey for a while, but the quality and diversity of choices would be higher, wouldn’t it?

(Follow me on Twitter.)

Oct 20 2009 09:23 AM ET

'Lie To Me': Why it deserves to live. Why it may not. You can help.

lie-to-me_l

Lie To Me, the Tim Roth I-know-what-you’re-thinking-because-your-eyelid-twitched crime show, just got an order from Fox for an additional three scripts. It deserves the full “back nine” order — a full season. Here’s why:

• It’s gotten better: more tense, funnier, smarter. Under new showrunner Shawn Ryan (The Shield), Roth’s Cal Lightman has been put under more pressure this season. He leveraged his company, The Lightman Group, to buy out his ex-wife and keep her from moving his daughter to Chicago. As those few of us who watched last night saw, Cal’s cranky about this. He has to take grungier, cheesier clients to drum up fast cash. And a cranky Cal is a very good Cal: Roth excels at orneriness.

Lie To Me deserves to prove itself over another season, to demonstrate where it’s going. It’s clear that Ryan, the producers, and the writers have a plan — they want to provide more intensity to the show, so it’s not just The Mentalist Lite. (Maybe that’s the wrong comparison: Can The Mentalist get any lighter? Oh, that’s right, it can: It’s called Psych.) Right now, following Fox’s King Crankypants, House, Lie To Me suffers from its lead-in comparison as much as it benefits from House‘s big ratings. It also gets bumped around, as it did last night, due to Fox’s airing of baseball play-offs.

• Last night, we saw how good Lie To Me can be. With a superb guest appearance by Garret Dillahunt (Deadwood) as a gun-wielding hostage-taker, Roth and co-star Kelli Williams really got to show what they can do. Lie To Me has all the makings of a solid, maybe even surprisingly original series.

But it needs more of a vote of confidence from its network. And from you.

Did you watch Lie To Me? Would you watch it again?

Follow me on Twitter. No lie.

Oct 19 2009 09:56 PM ET

New 'Jon & Kate Plus 8' episode: 'It's not fun, at all!'

jon.kate-birds_l

Turns out even when Jon & Kate Plus Eight is taped weeks in advance, the Gosselins still catch the pop-culture zeitgeist: What were Kate and three of the girls doing this week? Riding in a balloon, just (sorta) like Balloon Boy! And just like that poor Falcon Heene, the girls gave away the hoax of the adventure: “It’s not fun, at all!” one Gosselin girl yelled as the hot air and the swooping balloon made her cranky and woozy.

Meanwhile, back at home, Jon was hyping his segment as, “We’re gonna do destructive man-stuff!” Which just turned out to be Jon standing in the family’s Pennsylvania yard, inflating a six-foot plastic rocket, pumping it with air and water. It shot into the sky while the three boy Gosselins stood around and watched. Then Jon did it all over again. And the boys watched. Did not look like fun for them.

Or for the paparazzi standing behind a fence snapping pictures of this tedious activity. Yes, Jon allowed that to happen, adding, “Even the paparazzi were like, ‘What the heck is he doing?’” So asks America, Jon, so asks America…

Kate had taken the three youngest girls to Florida for that balloon ride, a visit to a butterfly museum where butterflies and parrots landed on their arms (lots of shrieking, mostly from Kate), and then a trip to a “bug zoo” (more shrieking, all of it by Kate).

It was a dismayingly Kate-centric episode. Even the balloon ride became less about the hot-air ride than about whether Kate, in high heels and a short skirt, could get into the balloon basket without giving the girls and the balloon men an accidental anatomy lesson. To her credit, she did refer to herself as an “idiot” for dressing this way in the marshes of Florida, but even that was a bit disingenuous: In the old days of Jon & Kate (we old fans remember, don’t we?), Kate wore sweatpants and baggy slacks. These days, Kate always has to appear on-camera in body-hugging garb, no matter how inconvenient it is for everyone.

Next week: what TLC is billing a “can’t-miss event: ‘You Ask, Kate Answers’” — Kate will read questions sent in by you, the audience. How much new stuff do you think we’ll learn?

While you wait for that, let me know if you watched and what you thought.

(And whether you’re a Jon & Kate-lover or -hater, you can follow me on Twitter.)

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP