<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new &#8216;Rockford Files&#8217;: Good idea, or bad? And what does James Garner think?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/</link>
	<description>Prime-Time TV commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:48:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BoBuck</title>
		<link>http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/comment-page-3/#comment-113930</link>
		<dc:creator>BoBuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watching-tv.ew.com/?p=810#comment-113930</guid>
		<description>Bruce Campbell would be the only person to pull off a take on Rockford Files.  I like Nathan Fillion, but I would rather see him stay on Castle, and to bring back Firefly.

No one could ever come close to James Garner, but Bruce Campbell would make a remake watchable.

Malrooney (not sure of spelling) would not even come close, but it looks like that is who they are going with.  With it on NBC no one will see it since NBC can&#039;t even tie their own shoes without falling into a wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Campbell would be the only person to pull off a take on Rockford Files.  I like Nathan Fillion, but I would rather see him stay on Castle, and to bring back Firefly.</p>
<p>No one could ever come close to James Garner, but Bruce Campbell would make a remake watchable.</p>
<p>Malrooney (not sure of spelling) would not even come close, but it looks like that is who they are going with.  With it on NBC no one will see it since NBC can&#8217;t even tie their own shoes without falling into a wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/comment-page-3/#comment-111783</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watching-tv.ew.com/?p=810#comment-111783</guid>
		<description>stupid idea. will not go past 5 shows .they tried it with kojack, knight rider and everything inbetween.hell lets just get a tv guide from about 1966 and go down the line and remake every friggin thing in it .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stupid idea. will not go past 5 shows .they tried it with kojack, knight rider and everything inbetween.hell lets just get a tv guide from about 1966 and go down the line and remake every friggin thing in it .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stiggs</title>
		<link>http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/comment-page-3/#comment-108910</link>
		<dc:creator>Stiggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watching-tv.ew.com/?p=810#comment-108910</guid>
		<description>Although I like Bruce Campbell I don&#039;t think he&#039;s right for Rockford.  The only actor i think could possible pull it off is too big for the small screen - Brad Pitt.  If they&#039;re actually going to try this they need to find the perfect person to play Jimbo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I like Bruce Campbell I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s right for Rockford.  The only actor i think could possible pull it off is too big for the small screen &#8211; Brad Pitt.  If they&#8217;re actually going to try this they need to find the perfect person to play Jimbo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Guido</title>
		<link>http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/comment-page-3/#comment-108526</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Guido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watching-tv.ew.com/?p=810#comment-108526</guid>
		<description>If someone like bruce campbell did it i would watch. but not some snot nosed young gun that could ruin it. honestly hollywoods been destroying all my old tv shows and movies that i cherished by remaking them. enough is enough. leave the classics alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone like bruce campbell did it i would watch. but not some snot nosed young gun that could ruin it. honestly hollywoods been destroying all my old tv shows and movies that i cherished by remaking them. enough is enough. leave the classics alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Ballard</title>
		<link>http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/comment-page-3/#comment-101670</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ballard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watching-tv.ew.com/?p=810#comment-101670</guid>
		<description>Dennis Quaid as Jim Rockford would be an excellent choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis Quaid as Jim Rockford would be an excellent choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ritz</title>
		<link>http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/comment-page-3/#comment-98480</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watching-tv.ew.com/?p=810#comment-98480</guid>
		<description>I think rockford could come back strong, if they kept James Garner as head of The Rockford agency, or maybe as a consultant brought out of retirement. It could work with younger gumshoes doing the rough stuff. Keep in mind the Richie Brockelman relationship worked well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think rockford could come back strong, if they kept James Garner as head of The Rockford agency, or maybe as a consultant brought out of retirement. It could work with younger gumshoes doing the rough stuff. Keep in mind the Richie Brockelman relationship worked well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAPA KESS</title>
		<link>http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/comment-page-3/#comment-97596</link>
		<dc:creator>PAPA KESS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watching-tv.ew.com/?p=810#comment-97596</guid>
		<description>Owen or Luke Wilson,Brandon Frasier,or Walton Giggns from the Shield(Shane}If NBC is going to do it they better do it with the right person.I watched that show with my father every Friday I would cast Chris Tucker as Angel and Dean Stockwell as the father of P.I. thanks papa kess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owen or Luke Wilson,Brandon Frasier,or Walton Giggns from the Shield(Shane}If NBC is going to do it they better do it with the right person.I watched that show with my father every Friday I would cast Chris Tucker as Angel and Dean Stockwell as the father of P.I. thanks papa kess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krys</title>
		<link>http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/comment-page-3/#comment-95830</link>
		<dc:creator>krys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 05:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watching-tv.ew.com/?p=810#comment-95830</guid>
		<description>how about george clooney as jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about george clooney as jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/comment-page-3/#comment-77822</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watching-tv.ew.com/?p=810#comment-77822</guid>
		<description>I THINK IT WOULD BE COOL I LIKES THE OLD SERIS ALOT,HOW ABOUT ED ONEIL AS JIM ROCKFORD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I THINK IT WOULD BE COOL I LIKES THE OLD SERIS ALOT,HOW ABOUT ED ONEIL AS JIM ROCKFORD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Allen White</title>
		<link>http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/07/30/a-new-rockford-files-good-idea-or-bad-and-what-does-james-garner-think/comment-page-3/#comment-41274</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Allen White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watching-tv.ew.com/?p=810#comment-41274</guid>
		<description>Bruce Campbell! Burn Noyice has run it&#039;s course and is now overly predictable. Bruce definately has the chin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Campbell! Burn Noyice has run it&#8217;s course and is now overly predictable. Bruce definately has the chin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
