Mar 5 2009 01:28 PM ET

Craig Ferguson and Jimmy Fallon, the Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Cameron Diaz: not just another late night

Categories: Television

Last night, Jimmy Fallon’s third show was by far his best yet. He was ad-libbing more easily (talking with guest Cameron Diaz about being a diva on Sesame Street, he spontaneously invented the new “Don’t Look At Me, Elmo” doll) and I chuckled at his new gesture when a monologue joke actually gets a laugh–he mimes bowling a strike.

Sure, still too much young-and-with-it awkwardness: reading Diaz questions from Twitter users? How Barbara Walters of you, Jimmy! The dance-off with Diaz was kind of fun, if a little too opening-of-every-Ellen De Generes-show. But overall, a definite improvement.

Meanwhile, Craig Ferguson’s guest last night was Archbishop Desmond Tutu, not exactly a mainstay of late-night entertainment. Ferguson’s conversation with the clergyman was by turns serious, funny, and sometimes both simultaneously (“When you don’t forgive, frequently you feel it in your tum-tum,” said the Archbishop, patting his own tummy) as they talked about race, God, good and evil. And nagging wives. All without reading from cue cards or notes. “I think you’re crazy!” Tutu chuckled at one point. Craig also told an excellent chess joke involving bishops.

Now, I am not for a second suggesting that late-night hosts should start booking more serious guests to boost their cred — even Ferguson said this hour contained “all the stuff that you don’t come to the show for.” Nor am I saying Fallon was the lesser host for yukking it up with Diaz while Ferguson chatted up a Nobel Peace Prize winner. These guys both make their living being, as Craig described himself last night, “a vulgar lounge entertainer.”

What I am saying is that Ferguson did a damn fine job interviewing Bishop Tutu without being intimidated or fawning, and in so doing, demonstrated the range of tones and subject matter that can be addressed on late-night TV to which Fallon can only aspire. No, I’m not sitting here hoping Fallon books the Archbishop of Canterbury on his show to demonstrate his chops and competitiveness (although, Jimmy, there’s a goldmine of comedy in all that some-churches-seceding-from-the-church thing going on in the Episcopal church).

But every time a late-night host stretches a little, whether it was Ferguson last night, or when David Letterman made his recent public apology to the late Bill Hicks’ mother as she sat next to him, these late nights get a little warmer, a little more nourishing, a little more welcoming.

Comments (1-30) of 45 Add your comment

Page: 1 2
  • Tom Brazelton

    I watched Fallon’s first two shows and thought they were pretty good. Now I’m kind of regretting I missed it last night. People have been slagging Fallon pretty hard, but I think he’s ramped up his game considerably in a short amount of time. I’m not saying he still doesn’t have room for improvement, but Conan was nervous on air for almost a year. Say what you want about Fallon, at least he’s comfortable in front of a camera.

  • lucy

    I strongly suggest a H ot place
    _____M illionaire Ro mances com_____ , Find rich true love here. The users on that site said Rihanna has an account on that site.

  • Kevin

    I agree and thought the 3rd show was the best yet. I was highly entertained, dancing with Diaz was great! The Crudup interview was one of my faves! Great job Jimmy, keep getting better.

  • Valerie

    Before going to bed, I stumbled across Craig and Bishop Tutu, and I was, like, “Wha-?” But I stuck around because I had a feeling Craig could pull it off, and he did. Between the two of them was an amazing mix of the silly and the serious, the funny and the enlightening, that you rarely see on television without really searching hard for it.
    What Craig was able to do is something a host can do after a good amount of experience wears down some of the ego and fear, making a person open about his/her limitations and strengthening his/her sense of curiosity. That helps no matter who the guest is. We’ll see in the coming years when Jimmy settles into that. To start a show during sweeps like he’s done is unfair, frankly, with so much pressure on him. Hopefully, he’ll survive it and mature into a really interesting host.

  • andrew

    fallon was alright…he needs to work on his mumbling though.
    i thought the bowling thing was stupid. too much trying to be like conan, and it wasnt even as funny as something conan would do. he should stop that

  • Adam

    That guy has to be the most huggable archbishop ever.

  • JIm

    I went to my moms house yesterday. She was watching GSN. She always does. They were running the first week of Password PLUS with Alan Ludden. He had hosted Password for years, but he was back in an important career move. He was awkward and nervous. It showed.
    My point is forget Jimmy Fallon’s first week. It’s going to be nervous and awkward. Skip to his 50th or 100th show and you’ll have a better idea if the show lasts or not.

  • TK

    Why aren’t we talking about Jimmy Kimmell–his show is HILARIOUS! He’s the best one on late night!

  • dashiki

    I was glued to the TV during Tutu’s interview.

  • lauren

    gotta love ferguson. he will easily move earlier once dave rides off into the sunset. he is a class act. conan, not so much. we rag on fallon, but the real person we should be worrying about is conan. that guy is not right in the head. i can’t see him in the palm springs time slot.

  • Rosie

    The interview with Archbishop Tutu was excellent. Ferguson knows his stuff and has the inteligence to keep up a conversation with such an honorable man. I really believe that Ferguson can interview anyone. The other late night hosts will always be scrambling with cue cards and desk notes (which Ferguson doesn’t use). The interview was so insightful that I was so bummed when it was over. I give Ferguson credit for keeping it real. If you’re not watching this show, you are missing some great television.

  • Mary

    Craig’s interview with Archbishop Tutu was extraordinary. I can’t believe he’s not interviewed more often on U.S. TV. That he can giggle so much after the horrors he has witnessed amazes me. I could’ve watched them talk all night. It’s to CBS’ credit that Craig was able to do the interview. He’s obviously very intelligent, which you can’t say about many late-night/talk show hosts.

  • Julia

    The truly important question here is what the HELL is Cameron Diaz wearing?????

  • LateNightFan

    Who is up this late? College kids that should be studying I guess. Maybe unemployed people? Insomniacs? I have no idea. But yeah, you have to give Fallon a chance. Week 1 means nothing.
    Meanwhile…times are tough. We all need an economic stimulus package! Well now there is a site where you actually earn quick money JUST for answering 3-question surveys! After you win enough money, you simply cash out and the money is sent directly to your Pay Pal account. And each week, there is a $250 drawing! How cool is that?
    If you’re interested, copy and paste the following link into your browser, register and enjoy some quick cash:
    http://www.instantcashsweepstakes.com/invitations/ref_link/7310

  • AshleyBrooke

    Aww, that dance off was cute

  • bondfool

    I just need to throw out another compliment for Craig’s wonderful interview with Archbishop Tutu. It was uplifting and enlightening, and it just goes to show that Craig’s the best host on late night.

  • JT

    The thing I like about Craig Ferguson is that he treats his audience like they actually have half a brain. He can talk about heady subjects like South Africa, supreme court justices, the US citizenship test, life in Scotland, even his late father, and still be funny. Most other hosts–especially Leno–shoot for the Lowest Common Denominator. They are lowbrow, crude, brainless, and unfunny. Can you imagine Jimmy Fallon or Jay Leno interviewing Desmond Tutu? *shudder*

  • Scott

    1) Fallon is relying too much on his audience by doing things they want or involving them directly. The other great hosts did their own thing and created an audience. Conan and Letterman did bits that no audience test would accept, but that makes them innovative and endearing.
    2) All hosts must experiment. Kimmel had weekly guest hosts and would do everything sitting down! As soon as he changed, his ratings soared. You have to change and quickly adapt.
    3) Fallon lovers have short-term memories. How many times did he laugh and ruin S.N.L. sketches?! He’s not built to host.
    4) Fallon’s success will be contigent on the talent he can get, or hit moments. An interview with a celebrity saving face like Leno had with Hugh Grant. An internet sensation like the “I’m F–king Matt Damon” video Kimmel had. A beloved character like “Triumph the Comic Insult” dog like Conan. He needs a strength. Leno’s monologue, Ferguson’s interviewing skills, Conan’s sketches, etc.

  • Courteney

    Last nights episode of Jimmy Fallon was really good, yeah some things might have fallen flat but so do things of other late night shows, i think by the end of the 2nd week hell have things down pat. You can already tell that thing have greatly improved from last nights show to mondays show, im excited to see tonights show

  • ricks

    The Tutu interview was terrific. Occasionally, Johnny Carson reminded audiences that he was smart, well-read, & thought about serious matters. Just save it for special occasions. Also, Craig’s C & D list guests are often more interesting than the A list guests Late Night gets the day after Letterman has them, & one wishes they were given more than one segment. It’s difficult to envision The Roots, Fallon’s great house band staying content with playing second banana & offering up laughs on cue.

  • Kristina

    I love what she was wearing!!! Does anyone know where it’s from?
    Please help!
    xx,
    Kristina

  • Tom Brazelton

    Scott,
    Your logic is flawed on your third point. There’s a difference between cracking up in a sketch on SNL where you’re creating the illusion of a scene and directly communicating with your audience. There is no preservation of the 4th wall on a talk show.

  • donner

    I love me some Craig…I haven’t seen Fallon yet, so I can’t comment…I have no interest in Fallon, but if he’s doing well, good for him…I’m loyal to Craig/Dave and can’t wait to see what Conan does w/ Andy by his side in June…

  • Robertoa

    I love Craig and I truly enjoyed his show last night with Archbishop Desmond Tutu it was awesome and heartwarming.

  • Robertoa

    I love Craig and I truly enjoyed his show last night with Archbishop Desmond Tutu it was awesome and heartwarming.

  • Robertoa

    I love Craig and I truly enjoyed his show last night with Archbishop Desmond Tutu it was awesome and heartwarming.

  • Meli

    The interview with Father Tutu was truly special. It’s rare we get an interview between two individuals with so much intelligence, humor, wisdom, and earthiness as what passed between Craig Ferguson and Archbishop Tutu on any network TV program.
    I applaud Craig for simply wanting to have a conversation with such a great man (which meant no reading cue cards), I applaud Father Tutu for being willing to go on the Late Late Show, and I applaud CBS for allowing Craig to have this kind of interview with someone that truly matters in this world instead of pushing the latest vaporheaded starlet.

  • Rosie

    As I’ve said before, I TiVo Craig Ferguson and watch every show, either live or later. I see no need to watch anyone else because he’s the best. I totally agree with the person who said everyone else shoots for the lowest common denominator. Craig gives us credit for being intelligent.

  • Frodo

    Fallon is fail, watch Ferguson instead, Ferguson is win

  • cathy

    the wonder of craig ferguson is that night after night he manages to make something charming out of nothing and then every so often as with bishop tutu he has something extraordinary to work with. craig is my must see tv. sleep be damned!

Page: 1 2

Add your comment

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Advertisement
Powered by WordPress.com VIP