Archive: February 2009 (21-30 of 35)

Feb 12 2009 02:01 PM ET

Joaquin Phoenix on 'David Letterman': Huh????

Categories: Television

Joaquin Phoenix, his face covered with beard and sunglasses, made one of the all-time weird, ranks-with-Crispin-Glover appearances on David Letterman last night. The audience started giggling as soon as Phoenix declined to acknowledge that he wasn’t behaving very sociably — monosyllabic answers, no smiles, avoiding Dave’s gaze. Finally Dave had to break the ice with a joke: "What can you tell us about your days with the Unabomber?" Check it out:

When Dave asked about the actor’s recently-announced move to become a rap-music performer, Phoenix said, "I’d love to be on the show and perform." Dave, by now happily irritated at this disastrous interview, said, "You know, that seems unlikely." By way of farewell, Letterman said, "Joaquin, I’m sorry you couldn’t be here tonight." 

What do you think about Phoenix’s appearance (in every way) last night?

For more Letterman/Phoenix: Joaquin Phoenix on Letterman: Real or hoax, that was good TV

Feb 12 2009 01:54 PM ET

Conan O'Brien, Gordon Ramsay, Norm MacDonald: Late night feast

Categories: Television

Jimmy Fallon was on Conan O’Brien last night and he was — well, even his future time-period competitor Craig Ferguson has asked us all not to judge Fallon prematurely. (Pssst: he wasn’t funny.) But the night before, Conan took one of the staples of late-night TV — the cooking segment — and with the raucous, frequently bleeped-out, obscene help of chef Gordon Ramsay and comic Norm MacDonald (Norm just doesn’t do enough television anymore, don’t you think?), the Crimson Comedian presided over a terrifically anarchic segment:

My favorite line of MacDonald’s: “Why would you become a cook?”

Feb 11 2009 04:02 PM ET

Letterman and the Flight 1549 pilots really take off

Categories: Television

Dave did a terrific interview with Captain Chesley Sullenberger last night–no surprise, given Letterman’s interest in aviation. But the real surprise of the night for me, and perhaps you, was the perfect, droll sense of humor displayed by Sullenberger’s co-pilot, Jeffrey Skiles. Check them out:

Feb 11 2009 03:27 PM ET

Toby Young: Top Chef stale item

Tobyyoungtopchef_l
Tonight’s a new episode of Top Chef: New York (oh, I pray to the spirit of Julia Child, please let Leah be booted) and thus another opportunity for judge Toby Young to prove once again that he’s the worst critic on TV, and yes, I’m not forgetting Ben Lyons.

Young arrived at Chef fresh (or rather, stale) from a stint reviewing restaurants for newspapers in his native England (sample bit of prose: “The ultimate test of a meal is whether it produces the same mouth-watering, eye-rolling effect that a donut has on Homer Simpson”–d’oh!), with a short stop at mini-celebrity for writing the book How To Lose Friends and Alienate People. As the weeks go by and Young’s pre-fab critiques now arrive with stand-up-comedy groans attached (“If I had to come up with a name for the dish, I’d call in Pablo Escolar“–thanks folks, be sure to tip your waitress!), we must wonder: Why did Young get this Chef gig? His descriptions of food veer off into lame movie or TV references instead of–well, food. And it’s not as though he’s a brilliant Brit wit–the Chef producers would have done better to import Nicholas De Jongh, the clever theater critic for Young’s former employer, The Evening Standard.

No, Toby Young will not do. He’s mucking up a season of Chef that needs all the liveliness it can get. If I had to come up with a name for his work, it would be (this is my salute to Young’s groaners) Toby Or Not Toby. I pick Not-Toby, please.

Feb 10 2009 07:26 PM ET

'The View': Joan Rivers says things about Cher's face you don't want to THINK about

Categories: Television

So Joan Rivers totters onto The View this morning to promote two new books and… she killed. Set up nicely for joke after joke about plastic surgery, g-spots, botox, and Valentine’s Day, it’s way worth watching this clip just for the Bea Arthur/Cher joke.
 


ICYMI – Joan Rivers Talks G-Spots On The View @ Yahoo! Video

If only Babara Walters had been on the panel today–she’d have fainted with embarrassment while everyone else guffawed.

Feb 10 2009 12:25 PM ET

'24' mediocrity-mole: Renee Walker

Categories: Television

Anniewersching_l
Last night, 24‘s FBI agent Renee Walker jumped her personal shark. (Spoiler [and I can't believe I have to add this for something that aired last night] alert.) All it took was two scenes: When she looked agonized at the notion of threatening the wife and baby of a bad guy, and when she stupidly told her boss Larry that Jack had killed that bad guy. Please understand, I’m not knocking Annie Wersching, the actress who plays Walker–she’s reading the lines and emoting as the scenes dictate.

But why do the 24 writers and producers have to make her such a sap? If Renee Walker is supposed to represent the conscience of this season–the character who’s caught up in Jack Bauer’s ruthless pursuit of his honorable goals–then why does Walker have to be such a wimpy sentimentalist? And why the hell did she have to go and rat out Jack to Henry? Sure, that move was a plot device, one that I’m sure will be analyzed brilliantly by my colleague Dan Snierson in his 24 TV Watch (go read it now!), but it just seemed so… pathetic. Making a woman the season’s weakest link–we’ve been there before. Her name was Kim Bauer…

Feb 9 2009 02:31 PM ET

Octuplets and Nadya Suleman take over NBC

Categories: Television

Nadya Suleman was “fixated” on wanting a “huge family” because she wanted “more affection from [her] mother.” That’s the story that was laid out this morning on The Today Show, as Ann Curry interviewed the mother of now-14 children. It was a coup for The Today Show–this is the kind of non-hard-news, tabloid-level story that morning shows adore: not tragic (the babies are alive and, on camera this morning, adorable in the hospital neo-natal unit we were shown) yet controversial (as Curry asked, “How will you feed all these children?”).


Suleman is now becoming into pop-culture focus: we’re getting used to her calm voice, her avid gaze at her questioner. If we accept the pop-psychology scenario The Today Show imposed on the story, Suleman, after a “failed seven-year marriage” and numerous miscarriages, ended up having a total of 14 children. She volunteered that much of her motivation was about “me projecting my own wants and wishes onto my children.”

“To what degree is this too much about you and not enough about them?” asked Curry, even as The Today Show made it more about Suleman and less about the babies. Suleman came off as articulate, pious (“God will provide in his own way,” she said in answer to the “how will you feed them” question), and troubled, admitting to feeling “guilt, fear, disappointed in myself” for not being able to carry the babies to term. Curry asked Suleman if she was “deluded.” I’d say that The Today Show could have spent more time on real hard news, such as the economy and the President’s struggling stimulus package, but what’s the point? A morning news show like this mixes hard and soft news–if Suleman wasn’t around, they’d have spent more time talking about the Grammy Awards, most likely.

Meanwhile, those babies await attention: from their mother, but also from an America that will probably do its usual variety of things: help them, condemn or praise their mother, exploit them, and gaze upon them blissfully. And of course: More about Nadya tomorrow night, on NBC’s Dateline.

Feb 8 2009 02:24 PM ET

'Saturday Night Live' last night: Well, at least TV On The Radio was pretty great

Categories: Television

You know that there are fond feelings for Michael Phelps as a former Saturday Night Live host when Seth Meyers’ best material on Weekend Update last night was a stinging rant against the guy who took a picture of Phelps and the bong.

Otherwise, what were the high points? Anyone like the Digital Short with T-Pain on the boat? Sure, host Bradley Cooper was pleasant and enthusiastic, but his material? The game show about having sex with contestants’ wives? Cooper’s okay Christian Bale impersonation in a dull bit about Bale’s rage? The intervention sketch where he and Kristen Wiig made rude noises? Speaking of Wiig, her Kathie Lee Gifford and Bjork were excellent, but I doubt I’m the only person who thinks she’s on-screen way too much these days–at best, she’s carrying too much of the load.

At the other extreme, the person not pulling his weight at all anymore has got to be disappearin’ Darrell Hammond.  What, that tiny, weird, stiffly-acted role of his on Damages is keeping him from SNL reheasals? I doubt it.

Oh, well–there’s always the next SNL: Alec Baldwin will be back. The Generalissimo returns!

Feb 6 2009 03:57 PM ET

Octuplets mom: Saint, cynic, or TV superstar?

Categories: Television

With the news that Nadya Suleman, the “octuplets mom,” is giving her first big interview to NBC’s Today Show and Ann Curry next Monday, you gotta wonder: Does this woman realize what she’s in for? Not from Curry, who specializes in soothing ooze, as is evident from the preview clip The Today Show aired this morning:

My first two reactions: 1. Wow, does this woman radiate a sense of, yes, Angelina Jolie-like, Zen calm, complete with spiritual-babble about wanting to “be present with” her kids. (You better be present, sister—you got a lotta diapers to change!) 2. Wow, could Matt Lauer be any more ditheringly delighted about this scoop, saying “Congratulations!” to Ann Curry twice, as though she had just given birth… which she did, in a sense: birth to a ratings bonanza for NBC.

But even before Suleman hired L.A. publicists to handle her story, the hostility started streaming out of our TV screens about this single mother of now 14 children…

Bill O’Reilly went ballistic.

O’Reilly goes so far as to say these birth amount to “child abuse,” because these kids can’t possibly receive the care they need. (Then he goes off on a rant about how we’re not “living in America anymore” because of these births—what, Bill? What country do you think you’re in now? Babypukeistan?)

I think one posting to an L.A. Times story on this subject summed up a lot of people’s feelings. The post read:

“What trash!! I certainly hope the media isn’t enticed to follow up with any offers.
Let the Jolie-Pitt gang adopt them, they’re looking …. at least they can afford them.”

Which, in its own sarcastic way, cuts to the heart of it: Suleman has turned herself into a media figure by seeking out interviews, so she doesn’t get the right to pursue a quiet, unexamined private life anymore. But many people think it’s OK for Angelina and Brad to adopt lots of kids, because they have the dough to keep the kiddies in mink swaddling blankets, while the apparently lower-middle-class Suleman gets grief because she’s not rich—indeed, the kids are viewed as her meal-ticket to wealth. I’m leery of trying to divine anyone’s motives, but right now, I mostly feel sorry for all 14 kids caught in this crossfire.

How do you feel about the octuplets mom, and the coming avalanche of media coverage?

READ FULL STORY »

Feb 6 2009 12:34 PM ET

Supernatural: 'Bash your mother's brains in, baby. Do it for me.'

Categories: Television

Supernatural_l_2
The best thing about last night’s Supernatural was the way it dramatized, in its distinctively paranormal, unsettling way, the rifts that have developed between brothers Sam (Jared Padalecki) and Dean (Jensen Ackles). The villain-of-the-week was a “siren,” an alluring figure that the Winchester boys were tracking down, responsible for making sane men crazy with what they think is just lust but which turns out to be blood-lust: at the siren’s bidding, the male victims kill a wife, a mother–any woman that the siren wants dead.

I’m sure you and I figured out that the hotsy doctor “Cara Roberts” (Maite Schwartz) was trouble from the moment she started coming on to Sam in her office. The truly unexpected twist was the way, after establishing via research unearthed by Bobby (Jim Beaver), that the siren was a woman, the brothers were ultimately seduced by one posing as a male FBI agent, because the siren sensed that only a man–specifically a surrogate-brother-type, not a woman–that could divide these brothers and prompt them to try to kill each other.

The siren-switch from female(s) to male made the episode a bit awkward; stripper-stripper-stripper-FBI-agent didn’t make for a very logical progession (or maybe you’ll explain for me–I can be dim about otherworldly things). But it did set up the evening’s emotional center: the fighting between Sam and Dean that the siren inspired brought to the surface all the roiling, unspoken emotions the guys have been feeling: about Sam’s ongoing involvement with Ruby; about Dean’s reluctance to reveal much about what went on during his time in hell.

The best stuff, for me, were the clever lines and the acting. Dean’s hearty, “Strippers, finally!” when he discovered the case led them to an exotic-dancer club; and (again, Dean’s line, after he figured out Sam had had sex with Dr. Cara) “[We're in the] middle of Basic Instinct and you banged Sharon Stone?”

What’d you think? Which Supernatural moments did you like? Do you think the brothers’ bashing each other will have future consequences?

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP