Archive: January 2009 (1-10 of 29)

Jan 30 2009 04:47 PM ET

Bruce Springsteen: Should he 'go rogue' at the Super Bowl?

Brucespringsteen_l

Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band’s half-time performance during the Super Bowl this Sunday has inspired a New York Times sports columnist to muse: “Who knows, maybe we’ll get lucky and there will be at least one bold moment… when Springsteen goes rogue and rails against… offensive Wall Street bonuses… Go ahead, Bruce, make those corporate fat cats squirm on their sofas. It’s a one-time forum — make a lasting impression,” concludes Harvey Araton.

Hey, I am usually all for spontaneous, socially-provocative gestures in mass-culture settings, but this strikes me as one of the worst ideas possible.

Given the history of Super Bowl controversies (hi, Janet and Justin), any serious political comment Springsteen might offer would attract negative criticism from even some of his biggest fans, don’t you think? I mean, it’s not as though Springsteen has been a wallflower about expressing his views on the past few years’ social ills. It’s just that I think he’ll inspire a lot more good will for his future political statements if he and his band just play the hell out of a few of their hits, gives the cameras that big Boss smile, and jogs offstage.

Or am I wrong? Do you think Springsteen should use his live-TV time to let loose a political blast as well as a musical one?

Jan 29 2009 06:33 PM ET

'Burn Notice': Has it lost its mojo?

Tagged:

Burnnoticemiami_dl

There’s a new episode of Burn Notice on tonight, and since its 2007 premiere, I’ve been a big fan of Jeffrey Donovan’s burned-spy Michael Westin. But starting last season, with the increased use of Tricia Helfer as a meanie trying to control Michael’s life, Burn Notice hasn’t been as fast-paced and clever. I like Helfer in Battlestar Galactica, of course, but in Burn, she’s now the element that drags the action to a halt every time. (It’s not her fault, it’s the way the role is written.) The show’s gotten bogged down to the point where, last week, our usually-confident Michael was reduced to whining, “I want my life back!”

I agree with my colleague Alynda Wheat, who wrote that the show has become “laden with a frustrating mythology [and] soggy emotional ties.” There’s also, to my eye, even less chemistry this season between Michael and Gabrielle Anwar’s Fiona. (Still love Bruce Campbell, though–all he has to do is walk around being Bruce Campbell and it doesn’t matter what his lines or subplot is.)

But I want my original, spunky, stream-lined, full-of-secret-spy-tricks Burn Notice back. Do you agree? Are you still watching?

For more Burn Notice:

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20203836,00.html

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20043337,00.html

Jan 29 2009 02:21 PM ET

'Supernatural,' 'CSI,' 'The Office,' '30 Rock,' 'Grey's Anatomy,' 'Hell's Kitchen': what do you watch at 9 pm on Thursdays?

Tagged:

Supernaturalcsi_l
It’s Thursday, so that means the usual quandry: what do I watch in real time, what do I tape? Usually, I’d watch the comedy combo of The Office and 30 Rock, and DVR Supernatural and CSI to watch at least one of those at 10 pm. But Office and Rock are in reruns tonight. So I’m tempted to watch my new addiction, Supernatural, at 9, since it’s a new episode and Jared Padalecki and Jensen Ackles are going undercover in their old high school to solve a case. Sounds like scares and laughs there.

CSI I’m monitoring especially closely to see how Laurence Fishburne is going to mesh with the forensics crew after William Petersen’s departure. (I liked Fishburne last week, but I’m already a bit tired of his mild-professor persona–I’d like to see him do what few CSI characters except maybe Nick have done: lose his temper, as a new guy who’s not yet as cool-cat-controlled as the other team members, and just pop a suspect in the jaw.)

Oh, yeah, and there’s–ugh!–Grey’s Anatomy. It’s a rerun, but I wouldn’t watch this anyway. In fact, I haven’t watched this weepy, corny drag of a show regularly since its first season.

And will anyone be watching the season premiere of Hell’s Kitchen? Gordo’s ranting are getting a bit stale for me–how ’bout you?

What do you watch at 9 p.m. on Thursdays? What do you tape for later watching?

Jan 27 2009 05:21 PM ET

The two best lines on TV last night:

Tagged:

Chloe on 24:

“Are you with the FBI?”

Chloe (looking–what else?–annoyed): “No, I’m a stay-at-home mom.”

Marylynnrajskub_l

Keith Olbermann on Countdown, after playing clip of Rod Blagojevich’s feeble Nixon impersonation on yesterday’s The View (imagine Keith’s tone very–what else?–skeptical):

“Wow, it’s so uncanny. Frank Langella can go s—- himself, huh?”

Keitholbermann_l

Jan 27 2009 02:00 PM ET

'Supernatural' and 'X Files' producer-director Kim Manners has died

Tagged:

It’s been reported that Kim Manners, a prolific, highly imaginative director and producer of TV shows including Supernatural and The X Files, died on Sunday. The cause was cancer. More details here and here.

Manners was among the people who helped Supernatural creator Eric Kripke define the invitingly dark visual palette of Supernatural; he directed numerous episodes of the series, including every season finale–crucial entries in the series that set up cliffhangers which moved the mythology of the series forward.

Kim_manners_l

For The X Files, Manners was credited as a producer for some of that series’ greatest episodes, including the Emmy-winning “Jose Chung’s ‘From Outer Space’” and “Clyde Bruckman’s Final Repose,” and directed such memorable entries as the creepy-funny “Leonard Betts.”

Manners was a subtle artist working in a commercial medium that doesn’t always prize such qualities. (Manners also directed a number of episodes of the terrific 1993-94 cult series The Adventures of Brisco County, Jr.) He was lucky to have found sympathetic creators to collaborate with, such as Kripke and X Files‘ Chris Carter. And they were lucky to work with him.

Jan 26 2009 04:53 PM ET

Blagojevich is 'King' for 'Today': my 'View'

Tagged:

Rod Blagojevich, the man with a meatloaf for a hairdo, the accused/disgraced Illinois governor, is unavoidable–he’s all over TV today. He made a buff-up-your-image appearance on The View this morning. He’ll be on Larry King Live tonight. He was also on Good Morning America and The Today Show early this morning, showing an impressive, if egomaniacal, display of film history, comparing himself to Jimmy Stewart and Gary Cooper and citing such classics as Mr. Smith Goes To Washington, It’s A Wonderful Life, Meet John Doe, and Mr. Deeds Goes To Town. (Maybe the first time he watched it, he thought the title was Mr. Deeds Owns The Town, and tried to model himself accordingly.)

Rodblagojevich_l

On The View, Elizabeth Hasselbeck wasn’t present (there was a death in her family–our condolences to her), and Barbara Walters was on via satellite from LA. She conducted a one-on-one interview, sedate and typically blah, before Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, and Sherri Shepherd were allowed onstage to dig into the meatloaf in person.

Unfortunately, the gals couldn’t stick a fork in him. Blogojevich yammered on and on about not being able to defend himself sufficiently in his upcoming impeachment trial. Whoopi and Joy, usually champion interrupters of each other, failed to interrupt blabby Blago. I really expected better from Joy in particular–she squandered her time asking about the governor’s “potty mouth” (who cares?) and asking him to do his Nixon impersonation (really who-cares?).

Does this actually mean we’ll have to pin our hopes on Larry King doing a decent meatloaf-grilling tonight on Larry King Live? Sheesh. When you have to look to ol’ Mumbly Suspenders for your TV scoops, you know a pop-culture/political scandal is losing steam.

What do you think of letting a guy like this do a media tour to polish his public image? Are you a Blago-phile or a Blago-phobe?

Jan 24 2009 04:23 PM ET

Obama, O'Reilly, Olbermann, oh boy!

Tagged:

This week, Bill O’Reilly announced he’s going to be Paul Revere in announcing news about the new Obama administration–literally, he’s calling himself Paul Revere, alerting the nation!–while Keith Olbermann made the argument for “Why the President-elect must prosecute torture.” (Olbermann’s argument sounds extreme only in context–that is, you rarely hear anyone say that on TV. But you can read about it in many places, including David Cole’s piece in the current New York Review of Books, and in Jane Mayers’ book The Dark Side.)

Billoreillyolbermann_l

Time-period rivals, Olbermann and O’Reilly are making 8 p.m. the place to go if you want sparky partisan politics other than Simon vs. That Judge Who’s Not Paula on Idol.

I wrote a measured view of The O’Reilly Factor and Countdown with Keith Olbermann, plus The Rachel Maddow Show and Hannity, in the new issue of EW. But an EW.com editor urged me to blog a bit further about this subject, so I’ll drop the sarcastic reference I made in the magazine piece about how The View is a trusted source of news (yes, Keith and Bill, it was sarcastic), and say I think Olbermann is, these days, far more dynamic a TV communicator than O’Reilly, whose tone and body-language make him look increasingly bored and dismissive.

Indeed, it’s the energy that Olbermann and his MSNBC lead-out, Rachel Maddow, bring to their shows that make them–politics aside for the moment–more compelling TV presences. A few years ago, I wrote a book with the title Kissing Bill O’Reilly, Roasting Miss Piggy, praising O’Reilly for his dramatic TV persona. Like everything else in television, however, things change; acts get old, new personalities come along and change the game. That’s just what Olbermann and Maddow have done. The MSNBC shows are livelier, punchier, and their guests are plucked from a wider range of politics, the media, and academia. (Last night, O’Reilly’s big guns were syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin, who as best I can tell qualifies as a pundit because she can deliver her hostility at Gatling-gun speed, and Geraldo Rivera because… well, because he can still bellow loudly enough to be heard through the moustache that now threatens to take over his face.)

More generally, though, I wonder: Do EW readers watch any of these shows regularly? Do you ever watch a show whose politics you don’t agree with, because you like the personality or energy of its host?

READ FULL STORY »

Jan 23 2009 01:36 PM ET

'Supernatural' is not a d---bag

Tagged:

Remember when I wrote in this space that I wanted to get into Supernatural, and asked for your help? Well, thanks much! I am now thoroughly immersed in the ‘Natural now, and last night’s new episode, the evocatively titled “Criss Angel Is A Douchebag,” was pretty terrific, wasn’t it? I liked the way the episode mixed a stand-alone mystery (something is enabling an old magaician to regain his skills while also killing other people when he performs tricks) with a nice dollop of Supernatural mythology (Sam’s temptation by Ruby to go off with her).

Supernatural_l

The episode, written by Julie Siege (great name for a writer), included both a nice swipe at pseudo-punk-magician Criss Angel (not just in the title but in the character of the obnoxious “Jeb Dexter”) and dexterous performances by veteran actors Barry Bostwick, John Rubenstein, and Richard Libertini.

Am I right, Supernatural fans? Was this a good one, a solid B+, or am I just operating with the enthusiasm of a newbie? And thanks again for all your episode-recommendations–I’m plowing through much of the past seasons based on your suggestions.

Jan 21 2009 07:17 AM ET

'Fringe': 'It's all rather tense, isn't it?'

Tagged:

So did you watch Fringe last night? When Joshua Jackson first mentioned the “giant, slimy, spiky slug,” I thought he was referring to Simon Cowell. Just kidding: This was at once the freakiest and most satisfyingly complex edition of Fringe to date. Let me count the ways I’m loving the show: (1) the new twists in the series’ overarching FBI conspiracy plot; (2) the elbows Anna Torv used in smashing Mitchell Loeb’s wife (good offense-fighting, and hello, Trini Alvarado, I remember you from the 1980 movie Times Square!); and (3) the detail that the giant slimy spiky slug was one cell from “the common cold.” Oh, and the fact that Walter is still dousing lab specimens with LSD.

Annatorv_l_3

Consider my mind blown. How about you–did you watch? Did you like?

Jan 20 2009 05:56 PM ET

President Obama the poet, and the inauguration poem

Tagged:

Elizabethalexander_l

Today’s challenge to the poet Elizabeth Alexander was even greater than previous poets who’d been asked to write verse for an inaugural day. After all, Barack Obama has written some pretty good poems himself, one of which can be read here.

Alexander’s poem proved to be a sturdy one, a steady march of free verse iambic pentameter that spoke of national resolve through the metaphor of “repairing the things in need of repair” and, in a nice image, confronting our current problems as “the figuring it out at kitchen tables.” Her one dip into sentimentality — “What if the mightiest word is love?” — was balanced by many other attractive turns of phrase, such as rendering this sunny, snowy Washington D.C., afternoon as “today’s sharp sparkle.”

What did you think of the inaugural poem, and President Obama’s speech itself?

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP